Whenever you use a stock image, it is crucial to understand the licensing terms associated with it. Otherwise, you could land yourself – or your client – in very hot water, legally speaking.
Unfortunately, like many legal documents, licensing agreements can be virtually indecipherable to the average reader. Making matters worse, the terms oftentimes vary from site to site. Just what is the difference between a regular and extended license? What exactly constitutes “licensee work,” and what does a “multi-seat” license mean?
Never fear! Here we’ve defined all of the key licensing terms for stock images you’ll need to know – in standard English. Memorize these and you’ll be equipped to protect yourself and act professionally whenever using third party images.
General risk and liability
One of the main reasons to use legitimate stock image agencies, rather than deal directly with artists or lesser-known sites, is that the agencies have your back in case any legal trouble should arise. They are typically able to vet the images that their artists submit, and they often promise that in case anything copyrighted or otherwise illegal does slip through and you get in trouble for it, the agency will do its best to cover your legal costs. Know these terms:
Protection from financial harm. Stock sites are able to indemnify their users to a high degree.
This refers to the promise that an agency will reimburse you in the unlikely event that you get in trouble for using one of its images. Some sites, like iStockPhoto, automatically offer a standard legal guarantee which promises to reimburse you up to a certain amount ($10,000 for iStock), but also allow users to purchase an extended legal guarantee for an additional cost, which promises reimbursement up to an even higher amount ($250,000 for iStock).
Types of licenses
Most stock websites offer the following types of licenses:
This license involves the most restrictions. The stock site will need to approve you and your client’s exact intentions for the image and may place restrictions on aspects like the geographical areas in which you are permitted to distribute the image, the size of your print run, the timeframe in which you are able to use the image, and so forth.
Typically, rights-managed licenses are also exclusive, which means that only one person can buy the image at a time and that person has sole rights to use the image. That also typically makes this type of license more expensive. This is in contrast to non-exclusive licenses, which allow an image to be purchased and used by thousands of clients all over the world at once, and are cheaper for this reason.
With a true royalty-free license, once you buy the image, you are free to use it again and again as much as you want at no further cost. As such, royalty-free images are almost always cheap and non-exclusive, as opposed to rights-managed ones. In general, the terms “stock image” and “clip art” imply royalty free (rights-managed images will probably not be called by these names), but this is not always the case, so you should make sure.
But make no mistake: royalty-free does not mean restriction-free. Many sites claim to offer royalty-free images but still impose a number of restrictions on things like whether you are allowed to use the image for commercial (profit-driven) purposes, the size of the print run allowed, and whether you can use the image for certain resale items like prints, calendars, mugs, mousepads, etc.
Sites like iStockPhoto, offer an extended or enhanced license at additional cost, which gives greater freedom in what you can do with an image. Always verify your client’s intentions so you can determine which license to purchase.
When reading through the terms of different types of licenses to determine which one you want, you will likely come across the following basic terms. You should understand all of them:
The party who is directly purchasing the license to the image. This could be you, the designer, or it could be your client. The client is the party who is ultimately trying to profit from the image.
The end-user is the last person who the image is intended to reach. If you are buying an image so you can print it out and pin it on your wall, then you are the end-user.
If you are a designer who is incorporating the image into a more elaborate poster for a client to pin on her wall, then the client is the end-user. If you are a designer who is incorporating the image into a book cover for a client, who is aiming to sell his book to customers, then the customers are the end-users.
Similar logic here. It is the ultimate product on which the image will appear.
As opposed to just the image itself, sometimes referred to as a standalone image, licensee work is what results when you incorporate the image into a larger design that involves independent skill and effort, whether it be a book cover, poster, package, or whatever.
Any stock image that is not free will probably specify that, as a designer, you are only allowed to hand over licensee work to your client — you can’t just distribute the image itself, because that would impact the agency’s ability to make a profit. (This is why we forbid designers from uploading stand-alone stock images on the handover page).
Sometimes called “build-it-yourself products,” this refers to marketplaces where users can make their own item, like a t-shirt, greeting card, mug, etc., by drawing from a set of available images. Many stock agencies forbid the use of their images in this manner.
Refers to licenses that allow only one person to download the image onto his or her computer. Multi-seat licenses allow a specified greater number of people (usually 3 – 5) to download the image — useful for agencies with multiple designers working on a single project, for example.
One end product, one end user. Imagine a vanity poster, edition of one, that is just going to go up on the client’s wall.
One end product, multiple end users — like a website.
One client, multiple end products. Imagine a single client who wants to use the stock image across various parts of company branding: website, brochures, packaging, etc.
Pretty self-explanatory. This is the case for many royalty-free stock images: once you download it, you can use it for as many clients as you like, as long as their respective intentions don’t conflict with the other licensing terms.
Some images have licenses that allow for editorial use only — for printing in newspapers, magazines, etc. to illustrate an article, not to try to directly sell something. This is in contrast to commercial use, where the image is used to try to sell something (book cover, packaging, what have you).
Refers to commercial use cases where the image is used on an item that will in turn be sold to consumers, like a book cover. Not all commercial use necessarily involves resale, though.
Here are the licensing pages for a few major stock websites, to give you an idea of where you should be looking:
You will soon notice that the amount of confusing legalese present in image licenses extends far beyond the list above. However, this list should cover the basics and help you to act professional when using stock. If there are any key points to take away, they are these:
- Always use official stock image sites. Otherwise you expose yourself to greater liability. If you find a really great image for “free” download on an unknown site, you can bet it is too good to be true.
- Don’t treat the “royalty free” designation as a blank check, because as we saw above, even royalty-free images often entail a breadth of restrictions.
- Remember that every client’s needs are different. Always run your images by the client so they can see if they need to purchase an extended license or some such add-on for their intended purposes.