Ian@ml picked a winning design in their Logo design contest

For just $210, they received 63 designs from 17 designers.

From logos and business cards to websites and stationery, you can get anything designed by running your own design contest on 99designs.

Find out how…

Software company specializing in embedded devices

$210

Custom Logo design package

Purchased for $210

(including 99designs fees)

1

  • Open
  • The contest was open to all designers

2

  • Selected a winner
  • The contest holder awarded a winner

completed

Congratulations to the winner, secondgig!
Held by Ian@ml in Logo design
  • Last feedback - Fri, 02 May 2008 09:20:21 +0000
  • Feedback 6%
Show All Unrated Rated
Order by Time Rating
  • Winning Design
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    4 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    4 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    5 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    4 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    4 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    4 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    1 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    4 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    4 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    1 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    4 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    4 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    5 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    1 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    2 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    5 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    4 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    2 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    2 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    1 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    1 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    2 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    2 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    2 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    1 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    2 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    3 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    4 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    5 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    2 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    2 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    1 Stars
    Actions:
  • Rating:
    1 Stars
    Actions:
Pages:
  1. 1
  2. 2
Next page:
Next

13 comments shown 13 total, most recent first

show
  1. User
    Ian@ml
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Wed, 07 May 2008 07:22:27 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar

    Er, 'in a rule' should be 'in a room'.

  2. User
    Ian@ml
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Wed, 07 May 2008 07:07:59 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar

    In this context, I meant 'concurrency primitive' as a device used to keep two threads of a program synchronized.

    That probably still doesn't make sense to non-coders, so I'll use a real-life analogy:

    Imagine a bunch of people arguing in a rule. So that each person's voice can be heard, they make a rule: before someone can talk, they must be holding a 'magic stick'. No stick, no talk. In this way, only one person can be taking at a time.

    The 'magic stick' is called a 'mutex' in programming-speak.

    No idea how you'd visualise or illustrate something like that, but I'd be interested to see if it can be done :-)

  3. User
    secondgig
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Wed, 07 May 2008 05:11:52 +0000
    Avatar

    lan could you please give me an idea on what a concurrency primitive is exactly ?

  4. User
    secondgig
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Wed, 07 May 2008 02:27:16 +0000
    Avatar

    I think I'll leave #35 as it is at the moment , it's probably as far as I can take it without changing the symbol. I will do up a few more designs later on.

  5. User
    Ian@ml
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Wed, 07 May 2008 01:56:06 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar

    #35, #36: Looking good. Definitely prefer the font from #35.
    #37, #38, #39, #40: These look pretty good, but it's not the sort of style that I'm looking for. I'm thinking more conservative/technology-based. Also, no purple :-)
    #41, #42, #44, #45: Wow, these look really slick. #41 is my favourite at the moment (colour scheme and layout are great), but the symbol - what does it mean? I need something that is recognizable - "lab beaker" or "sine wave" or "circuit board". I'm not sure how I'd describe the logo on #41. They look really, really nice though.
    #46: I like the simple layout, but it's all a bit too cartoony. Try simplifying the symbol.
    #47: Again, very cartoony.

    More general advice: no more beakers :-) They don't fit the 'conservative, professional' look that I'm after.

    Thanks everyone!

  6. User
    Cannonfoder
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Mon, 05 May 2008 20:22:41 +0000
    Avatar

    i wish people would stop using those silly atom thingies, try something new!!!!

  7. User
    Ian@ml
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Mon, 05 May 2008 04:47:27 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar

    Eek, ASCII art didn't work out. Let me know if the above explanation makes no sense!

  8. User
    Ian@ml
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Mon, 05 May 2008 04:43:16 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar

    #27: Looks good!

    #28: Yep, that's more like it. The two right-hand ones are the best, with the layout as specified in the brief.

    #29, #30, #31, #32: All looking good! My favourite of the bunch is #32. The only suggestions I could make would be on the left-hand side of the logo, bring the horizontal line with the circle down to the centre-line of the text (in line with the right-hand horizontal line). It'd work out something like a heartbeat or sine wave, like:

    _
    | |
    --| | |--
    |_|

    I'm also curious as to how it'd look with the font from #14, though I suspect that the current font is probably the best.

    #33: See the comments for #17 - having the M in the logo symbol tends to be awkward. I'd prefer something abstract or technology based, possibly using the themes that I've mentioned above.

    #34: I'm not sure what the symbol is meant to be, but again, taking something from the themes above should work well.

  9. User
    Ian@ml
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Sun, 04 May 2008 05:47:22 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar

    secondgig: Thanks, much appreciated.

    Sean: I'd like the basic layout to be roughly as specified in the brief - symbol on the left, text on the right in a single row. I need a fairly distinctive symbol that can be used independently of the text.

    #16: Nice idea. Probably don't emphasise the X so much - and again, symbol on the left, text on the right. Symbol needs to be distinctive. A heavier font would be good, too (easier to read).

    #17, #18: Interesting, I like the concept. It took me a while to realise that the particle pattern was an 'm', so probably change to something more recognisable. Roughly a 1:1 aspect ratio would be better.

    #19: Again, I like the idea, but the font seems a bit awkward. Also lose the HTML brackets and find a better symbol to stick out the front :-)

    #21: I don't like the gothic font, but the symbol is good. Something more technical would look better. Also, a bit of shading/highlighting would really show this off nicely.

    #22, #25: Definitely too cartoonish for my tastes. Sorry!

    Probably the key piece of guidance I can give at this point is 'professional'. I don't want something that looks cartoonish or childish - I want to give a slick, professional, slightly conservative appearance.

    Thanks again!

  10. User
    penflare
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Sat, 03 May 2008 13:04:12 +0000
    Avatar

    so what would you like me to change?

  11. User
    secondgig
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Sat, 03 May 2008 09:26:44 +0000
    Avatar

    i'll try working a few more lab and technical elements into #13 , will have something in a couple of days

  12. User
    Ian@ml
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Sat, 03 May 2008 07:36:45 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar

    #11, #12: better. The symbols still have a lot of details; remember that they have to be recognisable on business cards.

    #13, #14: These are great. Very professional-looking and simple. I like #13 better at the moment, but the symbol isn't particularly memorable. Maybe a waveform of some sort would work - heartbeat, decaying sine wave?

    #15: I prefer #6 at the moment, but there's not much in it.

    Thanks everyone!

  13. User
    Ian@ml
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Fri, 02 May 2008 23:40:07 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar

    Commentary so far:

    #1: I'd prefer something a bit less 'traditional' and more 'modern' and 'high-tech'. High-tech is probably a good theme in general, actually.

    #2, #3, #4: I like the general style, although the symbolic logo isn't particularly distinct. The colour scheme on #3 and #4 is good. As another general guideline, the symbol should probably be identifiable on the thumbnail view.

    #6: Interesting idea, good to see something suggesting entirely new styling :-) This could work if the bubbling liquid was more distinct and didn't look so much like a party hat when viewed from afar.

    #7: The font is good, but the symbol (M) is very much not in the style that I'm after. Less cartoony, more technology/conservative.

    #8, #9, #10: Need it to be more sophisticated and conservative. Definitely less detail - those symbols aren't distinct even when zoomed.

    Thanks for your submissions so far!