$250 - needs LOGO, BUSINESS CARDS and LETTER HEAD in Logo Design

Held by frasernm

Summary

Status
won
Status Comment
Congratulations to the winner, Raghav_Raghav!
Entries
35
Prize
$250
Details

A closer look at this contest

Created:
Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:19:40 +0000
Ends:
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:50:03 +0000
Modified:
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:49:42 +0000
Last Feedback:
Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:02:04 +0000
Comments:
16
Designers:
15
Feedback:
100%
Brief Summary

A logo, business card, compliments slip and letter head are needed for Gillidanda - a start-up web design company offering high quality website solutions.

The website theme will be based upon the logo.

Actions
Badges

Entries highest rated first

The following designers have withdrawn all of their submitted designs: (why?)

Discussion

16 comments shown 16 total, most recent first

show
  1. User
    Pixelised
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:53:04 +0000
    Avatar
    Avatar for Pixelised

    Just to confirm, payment received for the tagline. Thanks a lot.

  2. User
    Pixelised
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:52:36 +0000
    Avatar
    Avatar for Pixelised

    Just to confirm, payment received for the tagline. Thanks a lot.

  3. User
    richardhenry
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Sat, 24 Feb 2007 14:07:00 +0000
    Avatar
    Avatar for richardhenry

    Congratulations on the win, all the best!

  4. User
    xpressions
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:00:39 +0000
    Avatar
    Avatar for xpressions

    Congrats on the win!

  5. User
    frasernm
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:55:57 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar
    Avatar for frasernm

    Hi everyone,

    I've decided to pick Raghav_Raghav #8 as the winner of the contest. Tag line prize went to pixalised for "Striking Web Solutions" (though I closed the contest before I added that prize, so it won't let me show it above).

    Congratulations to the two winners.

    Cheers,

    Fraser

  6. User
    frasernm
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:30:33 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar
    Avatar for frasernm

    Hi again,

    I've reopened the contest for a few hours to allow one of the entrants to upload their stationery image. I'm not going to consider any new entries at this time.

    Fraser

  7. User
    frasernm
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Sat, 17 Feb 2007 20:15:02 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar
    Avatar for frasernm

    Hi everyone,

    I hope to choose the winner in a couple of days.

    I'd like to thank everyone for entering, I've been impressed by a large number of the entries.

    Cheers,

    Fraser

  8. User
    Graphix
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:22:25 +0000
    Avatar
    Avatar for Graphix

    Hi Fraser,

    That's great to hear! I am glad that you appreciate the value of these things. Now that you have cleared that up, I may (if I get time, as I am busy) enter this contest (and use the tagline!).

    I just hate to think of anyone having their ideas used improperly.

    Thanks for the quick clear-up and best of luck with the contest.

    Graphix

  9. User
    frasernm
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:16:30 +0000
    Badge
    Contest Holder
    Avatar
    Avatar for frasernm

    Hi Graphix,

    Should pixelised not win the contest, then I fully intend to come to an agreement with them over the tagline.

    Fraser

  10. User
    Graphix
    Actions
    Comment Date
    Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:57:35 +0000
    Avatar
    Avatar for Graphix

    Hmm, perhaps I am wrong, but does that tagline not belong to Pixelised, as it was his/her idea? After all, a tagline can be as valuable as the actual design itself.

    Surely it's not right to just decide to 'go with the tagline....' without gaining permission from the designer. Or maybe you have already got permission? If you have, then please ignore me. I just think it's wrong to use a designer's idea in this way.

    To me this is no different than asking designer's to use parts of each other's designs.