Entries highest rated first

• 

  Label:

  #17

  Entrant:

  By romasuave

  Rating:

  1 Stars

• 

  Label:

  #10

  Entrant:

  By El Gato

  Rating:

  1 Stars

• 

  Label:

  #9

  Entrant:

  By El Gato

  Rating:

  1 Stars

• 

  Label:

  #8

  Entrant:

  By El Gato

  Rating:

  1 Stars

• 

  Label:

  #7

  Entrant:

  By romasuave

  Rating:

  1 Stars

Discussion

1. User

   Ian@ml

   Actions

   • (view comment page)

   Comment Date

   Wed, 07 May 2008 07:22:27 +0000

   Badge

   Contest Holder

   Avatar

   

   Er, 'in a rule' should be 'in a room'.

2. User

   Ian@ml

   Actions

   • (view comment page)

   Comment Date

   Wed, 07 May 2008 07:07:59 +0000

   Badge

   Contest Holder

   Avatar

   

   In this context, I meant 'concurrency primitive' as a device used to keep two threads of a program synchronized.

   That probably still doesn't make sense to non-coders, so I'll use a real-life analogy:

   Imagine a bunch of people arguing in a rule. So that each person's voice can be heard, they make a rule: before someone can talk, they must be holding a 'magic stick'. No stick, no talk. In this way, only one person can be taking at a time.

   The 'magic stick' is called a 'mutex' in programming-speak.

   No idea how you'd visualise or illustrate something like that, but I'd be interested to see if it can be done :-)

3. User

   secondgig

   Actions

   • (view comment page)

   Comment Date

   Wed, 07 May 2008 05:11:52 +0000

   Avatar

   

   lan could you please give me an idea on what a concurrency primitive is exactly ?

4. User

   secondgig

   Actions

   • (view comment page)

   Comment Date

   Wed, 07 May 2008 02:27:16 +0000

   Avatar

   

   I think I'll leave #35 as it is at the moment , it's probably as far as I can take it without changing the symbol. I will do up a few more designs later on.

5. User

   Ian@ml

   Actions

   • (view comment page)

   Comment Date

   Wed, 07 May 2008 01:56:06 +0000

   Badge

   Contest Holder

   Avatar

   

   #35, #36: Looking good. Definitely prefer the font from #35.
   #37, #38, #39, #40: These look pretty good, but it's not the sort of style that I'm looking for. I'm thinking more conservative/technology-based. Also, no purple :-)
   #41, #42, #44, #45: Wow, these look really slick. #41 is my favourite at the moment (colour scheme and layout are great), but the symbol - what does it mean? I need something that is recognizable - "lab beaker" or "sine wave" or "circuit board". I'm not sure how I'd describe the logo on #41. They look really, really nice though.
   #46: I like the simple layout, but it's all a bit too cartoony. Try simplifying the symbol.
   #47: Again, very cartoony.

   More general advice: no more beakers :-) They don't fit the 'conservative, professional' look that I'm after.

   Thanks everyone!

6. User

   Cannonfoder

   Actions

   • (view comment page)

   Comment Date

   Mon, 05 May 2008 20:22:41 +0000

   Avatar

   

   i wish people would stop using those silly atom thingies, try something new!!!!

7. User

   Ian@ml

   Actions

   • (view comment page)

   Comment Date

   Mon, 05 May 2008 04:47:27 +0000

   Badge

   Contest Holder

   Avatar

   

   Eek, ASCII art didn't work out. Let me know if the above explanation makes no sense!

8. User

   Ian@ml

   Actions

   • (view comment page)

   Comment Date

   Mon, 05 May 2008 04:43:16 +0000

   Badge

   Contest Holder

   Avatar

   

   #27: Looks good!

   #28: Yep, that's more like it. The two right-hand ones are the best, with the layout as specified in the brief.

   #29, #30, #31, #32: All looking good! My favourite of the bunch is #32. The only suggestions I could make would be on the left-hand side of the logo, bring the horizontal line with the circle down to the centre-line of the text (in line with the right-hand horizontal line). It'd work out something like a heartbeat or sine wave, like:

   _
   | |
   --| | |--
   |_|

   I'm also curious as to how it'd look with the font from #14, though I suspect that the current font is probably the best.

   #33: See the comments for #17 - having the M in the logo symbol tends to be awkward. I'd prefer something abstract or technology based, possibly using the themes that I've mentioned above.

   #34: I'm not sure what the symbol is meant to be, but again, taking something from the themes above should work well.

9. User

   Ian@ml

   Actions

   • (view comment page)

   Comment Date

   Sun, 04 May 2008 05:47:22 +0000

   Badge

   Contest Holder

   Avatar

   

   secondgig: Thanks, much appreciated.

   Sean: I'd like the basic layout to be roughly as specified in the brief - symbol on the left, text on the right in a single row. I need a fairly distinctive symbol that can be used independently of the text.

   #16: Nice idea. Probably don't emphasise the X so much - and again, symbol on the left, text on the right. Symbol needs to be distinctive. A heavier font would be good, too (easier to read).

   #17, #18: Interesting, I like the concept. It took me a while to realise that the particle pattern was an 'm', so probably change to something more recognisable. Roughly a 1:1 aspect ratio would be better.

   #19: Again, I like the idea, but the font seems a bit awkward. Also lose the HTML brackets and find a better symbol to stick out the front :-)

   #21: I don't like the gothic font, but the symbol is good. Something more technical would look better. Also, a bit of shading/highlighting would really show this off nicely.

   #22, #25: Definitely too cartoonish for my tastes. Sorry!

   Probably the key piece of guidance I can give at this point is 'professional'. I don't want something that looks cartoonish or childish - I want to give a slick, professional, slightly conservative appearance.

   Thanks again!

10. User

    penflare

    Actions

    • (view comment page)

    Comment Date

    Sat, 03 May 2008 13:04:12 +0000

    Avatar

    

    so what would you like me to change?